On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:55:11 GMT, "FredCThompson" <fthompson@rnc.org>
wrote:
>I'm staring to think that you are right about not posting any text messages
>in the movie groups.
Let's give it a practice trial, with YOU not posting any text,
anywhere.
>
>If we could all agree not to do so, and chose one group alone for posting
>responses, thank yous, etc. then the group where the binaries are posted can
>remain free of clutter and trolls alike.
Does that mean that YOU will not be there?
>
>I think secret groups are a bad idea too.
Only if YOU learn about them.
>
>Secret groups, password protection, encryption, and other means of
>subterfuge just make it even harder for people who already spend a lot of
>time looking for this stuff to get it.
It helps to keep groups safe from people like you.
>
>What is the point of posting on usenet if it's not to share it with people
>who appreciate it?
Posters try to avoid sharing with people who do not appreciate it,
such as yourself.
>
>I don't like having to come up with ways to tell people where the groups are
>and I don't like my motives questioned when I do.
Then do not do it. If the posters want to tell people about other
groups, then let them. If not, then mind your own business.
>
>I posted several messages before asking if anyone had any objections and I
>saw NOTHING posted in reply. except people asking me to do it.
You are a liar. Several people posted objections, and NOBODY asked you
to troll the group.
>
>Then, before I had a chance to post the answer to my question in the new
>group, I was told that I will "never learn" by someone who obviously
>supports secrecy but made no effort previously to respond to my requests for
>input.
Bullshit. Who do you think you are fooling here? Yourself?
CJ
|
|