On 7 Jul 2005 00:46:02 -0500, PM@cannon.bang wrote:
>Those that have known me for some years will probably remember that a
>few years ago I lost many so called friends here because I posted
>comments about this particuclar film. Sufficient to say that I see
>there are those which agree with my original comments. PM. NP.f35.
>
>
>
>On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:20:16 -0500, "Billy" <Billy269@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I think he was drugged. Implied anal intercourse, that would have woken
>>anybody up even while drugged by most stuff. This is very sad and very
>>wrong.
>>
>>Billy
>>
>>
>>"chakotay" <chakotay2645@hushmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:m2onc1d57cul4ivd9buhqa0oglgn6og6d1@4ax.com...
>>> hi all
>>>
>>> i was just wondering is that boy drugged or asleep? because he doesnt
>>> seem to respond at all surely he would have woke up as he was being
>>> lifted up by the man
>>>
>>> what do you people think ?
>>
>
>
>
>
><When your heart is weighed against the feather, may the feather be the heavier.>
And I stand in agreement with PM regarding abuse of this caliber. Vile
pig is not a strong enough name.
Felonious Monk
|
|