Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Adieu <invalid@example.com>
Subject: Re: Steve Leyland flunked out of ||Usenet Dumb Dumb School || she's NOW attempting to look important!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.aavfff
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: The League of Notions
References: <4272d24c$1_2@127.0.0.1> <d4ul7t$dcb$1@valis.databasix.com> <6oKdnR8QxNAzYu_fRVn-iQ@adelphia.com> <d4v3m7$cp5$1@pookiehead.databasix.com> <2uCdncfJDMvlgO7fRVn-iA@adelphia.com> <d51cqp$oqa$1@valis.databasix.com> <GLWdnWICh_Jz1-nfRVn-3w@adelphia.com> <d51i98$lk4$7@herekittykitty.databasix.com> <WMidnc6LjaA-0unfRVn-oA@adelphia.com> <d51ndh$nsv$1@herekittykitty.databasix.com> <IqqdnYnchLRxF-nfRVn-3Q@adelphia.com> <d5388m$6m1$1@flonk.databasix.com>
Message-ID: <1ejgwgn4jh2os$.1d8gyry8i7snc$.dlg@40tude.net>
Distribution: nogoogle
X-No-Archive: Yes
Lines: 85
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:10:54 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.aavfff:807
Soque (Enjoque) Pupette wrote:
> jet wrote:
>> In article <d51ndh$nsv$1@herekittykitty.databasix.com>, "Soque (Enjoque) Pupette" <soque@databasix.com> wrote:
>>> jet wrote:
>>> > In article <d51i98$lk4$7@herekittykitty.databasix.com>, God wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, 01 May 2005 03:20:11 GMT, jet@untool.net (jet) wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> >> >Why don't they go post in the alt.binaries.youth-and-beauty.* and
>>> >> >alt.binaries.aoi with the rest of the child porn traders? They've been
>>> >> >the accepted kiddie porn groups for as long as I can remember. That's
>>> >> >what they're -for-. Even alt.fan.air would do, if the prefer stealth
>>> >> >binaries.
>>> >>
>>> >> Unacceptable. afa is not a binaries group, stealth or otherwise.
>>> >
>>> > You are incorrect. Alt.fan air, along with alt.fan.prettyboy,
>>> > alt.oyp.sworp and alt.svens have been stealth child porn groups
>>> > since at least 1998 and most of the alt.fan.*, alt.als.* and
>>> > alt.mag.* hierarchies are considered general stealth binaries
>>> > hierarchies.
>>>
>>> Are you saying that binaries in those groups and hierarchies
>>> are not misplaced? If so, I worry about the scaleability issues
>>> that arise from a policy that condones stealth binary groups.
>>>
>> I don't think I said there was a "policy that condones stealth binary
>> groups". The word "stealth" might indicate the opposite.
>
> And the word "misplaced" might indicate that the binaries belong
> in binary groups.
>
>> It's just that
>> it's been common knowledge that those particular groups are stealth binary
>> kiddie porn groups for many years and collectors subscribe to servers
>> that don't filter the binaries.
>
> I'm not trying to make this point from the view of the collectors.
> I'm looking at it from an _operational_ standpoint. Specifically,
> I'm considering the impact of misplaced binaries (regardless of
> content) on non-binary news sites.
>
>>
>>> How many stealth binary groups does a text-only newsadmin have
>>> to consider in their configs to effectively manage their
>>> bandwidth and spool space?
>>
>> I would imagine a text only server 'clean-feeds' out all binaries, no
>> matter where they occur.
>
> Filtering binaries after receiving them is sub-optimal from a
> bandwidth management perspective. It's far more efficient for the
> peers not to feed the text-only news sites binaries in the first
> place. A news site that offers non-binary feeds needs to specify
> which sub-hierarchies to exclude from the feed. Using the "!" symbol
> to indicate negation, the config line might contain somehting like:
>
> alt.*,!alt.binaries.*
>
> but, if it's necessary to add !alt.mag.*,!alt.fan.*,!alt.als.* plus
> a splattering of single groups and add new (misplaced binary) groups
> as they appear then there is extra administrative overhead to
> endure as text sites ask their peers to adjust their config.
>
> Plus, with this config, the other (text) users in those sub-hierarchies
> that aren't in a misplaced binary group suffer inhibited propagation
> to text sites.
>
> I submit that misplaced binaries have an adverse impact on propagation
> (a core operational consideration) for _other_ (text) users.
>
>> TMK, nobody is issuing bin-cancels outside of
>> the Big 8, anymore.
>>
>> I'm sure someone in policy could give you a better answer, or you could
>> look up the previous discussions. <shrug>
>
> I've seen the discussions. I'm countering (in a content neutral
> manner) your argument that these misplaced binaries should
> be allowed because they've been doing it for a long time.
Why dont you and your bloody boring words just fuck off? Same goes for the
rest of ya. Christ, what a tedious bunch of wankers. Go on, fucking shoo.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|