Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Pope Frogbutt I <frog@buh.shit.org>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.aavfff
Subject: Re: Call to arms.
Date: 30 Apr 2005 15:22:36 GMT
Organization: frog@buh.shit.org
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <Xns96486999B56BEfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.113.17>
References: <427339ee_1@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: (4ciB9Zk4!kT.KC_aEY&[_T@7}8[f16mFoi$Fn{f8c2Q,hwLdxzlLb^cIOOLHTS`g7tyB<f/PZS%+YE0%KPiTnE<L><nQ(eVx5phIL}Q$X$+|68^EdSKirHwb/0jV;
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.aavfff:686
"Val" <Val@nowhere.com> wrote in news:427339ee_1@127.0.0.1:
> I think they feel it is not worth it. If ignored the idiots will go
> away with time. If fought, then your playing their game (of needing
> attention). Otherwise post thousands of small nude boy pics to our fav
> groups.
>
> But your outrage is justified. I've been charged with a state felony
> offense of creating a disturbance on the Internet before. So I'm not
> making a big stink over it. Now here is a clue. If I can be charged,
> try to charge them with the same thing. I believe it is considered a
> 'denial of service' attack on the Internet and that is illegal.
>
> Nude pictures of boys (or girls) is protected legal by US Federal law.
>
> Just an idea.
> Val
How about the kiddie porn movies you're spamming alt.fan.air,
alt.oyp.sworp, alt.fan.fog, and all the other froups with? Are they
protected? Do you really want all those to come out? Damn, you're a
fucking moron.
--
Meet the f'loons:
Lady Motown: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=185542
Deggie: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=181922
Pam: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=180995
Kenny: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=181357
John: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=181326
Keesha: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=181273
"HIAY HU WANTZ 2 FEELL MAI TITS?////" - Britney Spears discovers the
internet.
|
|