In article <0001HW.BE95B62700F076B7F02845B0@news.easynews.com>, Duey
<Duey@McScrooge.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:48:07 +0700, Y-Not:: wrote
> (in article
> <270420050748076766%$9+-Y-Not@here.com>):
>
> > There are other newsgroups that can be moved to, that are known to BLs.
> > What do you say to such a move? What could it hurt? This group was
> > theirs, anyway. Can't we respect their desire to have it back?
> >
> > Of course, the problem with such a move, would be telling people what
> > the new group name is, without informing some people who wouldn't be
> > invited. I know of a group that has been used by BLs in the past, with
> > no opposition that I can remember. It hasn't been used in a long time,
> > and it's on most servers. I don't think the last people who used it
> > would mind too much if this group took it over.
> >
> > I could mention the group name here, or I could inform some people of
> > it in email. So, what's the verdict?
> >
> >
> > Take care all,
> >
> >
> > Y Not
> >
> >
> > "Our value is equal to that which we place onto others."
>
> I sent in a flooding complaint. Who knows if
> that will have any effect.
>
> You could run some test posts to this group you
> mentioned. Even if it's an old group a lot of
> folks (including lurkers) might know it and be
> checking it periodically.
>
> If that doesn't seem to catch attention then
> maybe there is some way to give the name of a
> series of posts that will obvious only to those
> who really are intereted (which could admittedly
> include some folks who we'd rather not see
> there)....
>
> I've often wondered if there isn't a way to name
> a groups without doing so obviously. I like
> puzzles, let me think on it for a bit.
>
> Duey
>
Started to build retention in the other selected group.
Clues:
Remember the Buddhist I dealt with, who was messing up in a particular
group? The group I selected was once used for reposts for that group. I
posted to build retention, because it hardly gets any spam, so it was
in stasis on many servers, due to inactivity.
I could tell you it's name in email, but Hush seems to have some
problems at the moment.
You know what I've been posting. It's more of the same, but an older
set of 785 pics.
Y Not
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
|