On 27 Apr 2005 16:50:43 GMT, Pope Frogbutt I <frog@buh.shit.org>,
wrote:
>Duey <Duey@McScrooge.com> wrote in news:0001HW.BE95B62700F076B7F02845B0
>@news.easynews.com:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:48:07 +0700, Y-Not:: wrote
>> (in article
>> <270420050748076766%$9+-Y-Not@here.com>):
>>
>>> There are other newsgroups that can be moved to, that are known to
>BLs.
>>> What do you say to such a move? What could it hurt? This group was
>>> theirs, anyway. Can't we respect their desire to have it back?
>>>
>>> Of course, the problem with such a move, would be telling people what
>>> the new group name is, without informing some people who wouldn't be
>>> invited. I know of a group that has been used by BLs in the past, with
>>> no opposition that I can remember. It hasn't been used in a long time,
>>> and it's on most servers. I don't think the last people who used it
>>> would mind too much if this group took it over.
>>>
>>> I could mention the group name here, or I could inform some people of
>>> it in email. So, what's the verdict?
>>>
>>>
>>> Take care all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Y Not
>>>
>>>
>>> "Our value is equal to that which we place onto others."
>>
>> I sent in a flooding complaint. Who knows if
>> that will have any effect.
>>
>You ignorant fucking pedo shit. What if we send in complaints about you
>flooding alt.oyp.sworp and alt.fan.fog and all the other froups you slime
>are in with your little child abuser movies? You are as clueless as Y-
>Tard is stupid. If anyone gets tossed because of your insane complaints
>you are risking an all out war and you will have no one but yourself to
>blame.
If this nomination is accepted by the FNVW, I will be glad to second
it and retract my previous nomination for one of the individual pedo
scumbags.
Jade
|
|