On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:59:35 +0700,
zsdfoiwekl@asrdfpo.com wrote
(in article
<425b46cf$0$5845$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>):
>
> On 10-Apr-2005, "Rolex" <kidrolex@hushhush.com> wrote:
>
>> Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus:424828
>> alt.binaries.pictures.boys:267266 alt.fan.prettyboy:712310
>> alt.fan.aavfff:25487
>>
>> Quite multl-posting in every god damn newsgroup----you dumb fuck
>
> Stick with me for a minute there Rolex. I am guessing that any text post
> that exceeds 5 lines you probably get bored with and don't read them.
>
> First things first. If you are going to flagrantly condemn someone for doing
> something wrong, make damn sure you don't do the same thing yourself. I am
> not sure if you noticed but you multi-posted YOUR message back to Val, "in
> every god damn newsgroup," also.
>
> Second, I previously suggested that you either quit your name calling or
> adopt another nic, sort of a henchman's nic so that you can do your name
> calling and it won't invite the enraged to flail back at you (as in YOU
> Rolex the resurector of the flonk flonk flonk group) and attempt to harm
> something you obviously like (such as flame this group or out the group or
> other such spiteful behavior) because you pissed them off by name calling.
>
> Now, in case you haven't noticed, Val is new to the usenet. He comes with
> some stuff to share and is eager to do so. So far, this is a VERY good
> thing, right? Well maybe Val hasn't noticed that due to the spammers who
> harvest group names from post headings, and due to the fact that our
> detractors are constantly on the prowl to seek us out so that they can
> monitor us, and that is the reason why we do not "multi-post" aka crosspost
> to more than one group at a time. You missed a golden opportunity to educate
> Val to these intricacies of the usenet by simply explaining them. But
> nooooooooooo. Instead of making a friend for life, you probably created a
> brutal enemy for life who will never miss an attempt to piss you off because
> you pissed him off first. Do you get the picture? Am I making sense? I
> mean, if I'm not then please let me know but also, please don't just call me
> a----dumb fuck.
>
> Then again, I may very well be a dumb fuck. Maybe you enjoy flaming and
> getting flamed.
>
> Z
Hopelessly optimistic maybe, but not dumb. No.
|
|