On 4-Apr-2005, High <Hight@low.com> wrote:
> You want Rolex to create an avenging angel persona?
> Don't we already have enough of them? Why would we need new guardians
> here, when we have you and Y Not? :-)
Haha. Excellent point(s). Regarding the avenging angel persona, I meant for
that to be used in other places, not in here. After all, I think the other
places is where he caught the crabs. Surely not here!
> Isn't it a little strange, that you and Y Not seem to have changed your
> respective roles here? Y Not posted an uncharacteristically short,
> simple and blunt declarative message, while you posted a long and
> involved cerebration.
Yes it is strange. My inititial reply was much larger but then I went over
it and took out all the mention of my degrees, my experience, and knowledge
gained from associates. I then went back and took out all references to me
being right because no one knows more, and was left with a reasonably sized
post. Ahhhhhhhh, I feel a 220 line reply coming. Actually, it is fun to
occasionally agree with hizzoner Y-Not.
> In the Fort, TomBa wanted me to point out, but in his more colorful
> language, harmful intents.
There are times when I wouldn't mind starting a Tourette's style war of
words. The trouble with this is that the high I get from calling someone a
fucking asshole lasts about as long as a hit on a crack pipe and the
resulting crash is just as bad. I don't mind calling a spade a spade but I
try to refrain from calling an asshole an asshole.
> Have a nice day,
>
> High
And you too,
Z
|
|