Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: SushiLover <sushilover@chopsticks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.wiseguys
Subject: Re: Batman
Message-ID: <c5tutahdko6bvcl5bm861sf87j6o9r47mq@4ax.com>
References: <b47895e48fa8e3f04722ce3e492ce071@remailer.cpunk.us>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@n-o-s-p-a-m.pureusenet.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:36:18 UTC
Organization: Pure Usenet - Usenet for everyone
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:36:17 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3477853821
X-Original-Bytes: 1943
X-Received-Bytes: 2181
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.wiseguys:22
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:31:15 -0400 (EDT), Jack Ryan
<noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote:
>Why has every file posted recently as HG and PAngels been tampered
>with? The hashes, MD5, CRC and importantly SHA1, are all entirely
>different to the originals and the filesize is different...any idea?
>
>They're not even showing up as "known bad files" in Mr Bill's
>Master Sorter csv and that had more bads than originals.
>
>Everything else you've posted has been ok and aligned with the
>originals. But not this time.
>
>And how can you be posting from astraweb, with X-trace enabled, and
>not be ...you know? Not questioning your integrity at all, just
>very curious. Maybe you're faking the headers, but that is very
>hard to do, takes a lot of expertise.
>
>eg
>Original
>
>Name: bd-phan_lolita15.03-001.jpg
>Date: 6/18/2008
>Size: 284 KB (291,276 bytes)
>--------
>SHA-1: 1fdc46115799a16281d8bef227aa258d5e4287a2
>MD5: 6b56f1ffdc688b47ed556c44ac74166d
>CRC32: efbdae67
>
>Yours
>
>Name: bd-phan_lolita15.03-001.JPG
>Date: 8/26/2015
>Size: 265 KB (271,818 bytes)
>--------
>SHA-1: 2ba55e9c93dedf6e7c60039a63415a471706a654
>MD5: c4c830ff8037ef0a6bb47206ac36e13b
>CRC32: 3e1067c5
Wow, you could have at least said thanks first.
|
|