KG96 <KG96@alpdehuez.com> wrote in
news:0001HW.C698558A0004D14AB092496F@news.newsguy.com:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:57:27 -0400, KG96 wrote
> (in article <0001HW.C698546700048D25B019F96F@news.newsguy.com>):
>
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:56:01 -0400, Fishnet_Fred wrote
>> (in article <a08575l4ubev2ps37049t5juv5a7omqgip@4ax.com>):
>>
>>> On 30 Jul 2009 11:06:12 GMT, DDMD <DDMD@DDMD@DDMD.COM> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I really think people posting RAR and PAR files is good for the
>>>> group. Keeps things neater, giving us less to look through
>>>> for what we want. But moreso than that, it keeps collections
>>>> properly catalogued, and stops the problems with badly named
>>>> files (mostly older sets, with filenames that don't represent the
>>>> set number) and the hassle of trying to work out which files are
>>>> from which set.
>>>>
>>>> Now that the links have been posted for MAC based RAR programs,
>>>> hopefully it will continue and even expand to be used
>>>> by all the posters, over time. :D
>>>
>>> It really doesn't matter to me how people post, I never knew there
>>> was an issue with Macs n RaR's, but I'm glad there's a fix. If you
>>> put every set in it's own folder, it is a lot easier to just bundle
>>> a bunch of sets together.
>>>
>>> I probably won't post rars all the time, but for large posts they're
>>> the only way to go.
>>>
>>> fred
>>
>> Fred...
>>
>> It's easier to view them as reg jpg's.
>> Why bother to post rar's and par's then have to go into another
>> program to see them.
>>
>> Recently you posted ChristinaUK.
>> I never saw one of them. She is on the top 5 list of favorite women
>> that I have seen here.
>> I am hoping for a repost of those in the old fashion way.
>> Thank you very much
>>
>> KG96
>>
> One more thing about rar's.
> Each file is rather large, Some of us pay for a certain amount of MB's
> GB's per month.
> This may use up our monthly allotment.
> Please rethink your reasoning.
> I believe many people would agree with me.
>
> Thanks for all the great posts you have done in the past.
> I always appreciate what you post.
>
> KG96
>
>
My best suggestion then is to convert your accounts into unlimited accounts
instead, since then you dont have to worry about running out of GBs.
Such accounts also comes cheap today, $39 for 3 months unlimited, thats
what you only have to pay at my provider, Astraweb.
--
Henrik Laursen
|
|