On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:56:01 -0400, Fishnet_Fred wrote
(in article <a08575l4ubev2ps37049t5juv5a7omqgip@4ax.com>):
> On 30 Jul 2009 11:06:12 GMT, DDMD <DDMD@DDMD@DDMD.COM> wrote:
>
>> I really think people posting RAR and PAR files is good for the group.
>> Keeps things neater, giving us less to look through
>> for what we want. But moreso than that, it keeps collections properly
>> catalogued, and stops the problems with badly named
>> files (mostly older sets, with filenames that don't represent the set
>> number) and the hassle of trying to work out which files are
>> from which set.
>>
>> Now that the links have been posted for MAC based RAR programs, hopefully
>> it will continue and even expand to be used
>> by all the posters, over time. :D
>
> It really doesn't matter to me how people post, I never knew there was
> an issue with Macs n RaR's, but I'm glad there's a fix. If you put
> every set in it's own folder, it is a lot easier to just bundle a
> bunch of sets together.
>
> I probably won't post rars all the time, but for large posts they're
> the only way to go.
>
> fred
Fred...
It's easier to view them as reg jpg's.
Why bother to post rar's and par's then have to go into another program to
see them.
Recently you posted ChristinaUK.
I never saw one of them. She is on the top 5 list of favorite women that I
have seen here.
I am hoping for a repost of those in the old fashion way.
Thank you very much
KG96
|
|