On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:46:59 +0100, WeDontBelieveTrolls
<wdbt@newsgroups.com> wrote:
>This is the FOURTH time I've told you this.
>I hope I don't have to tell you again.
You will most certainly have to sonny.
>
>If you post text (i.e. keyboard characters)
>ostensibly from Butterfly or anyone else,
>that does not necessarily mean that it's
>actually from the claimed sender.
That is very true, and always a risk. But yo CAN prove it to yourself
by doing the same as I did, and contact any of those who are featured
in the recent posts. They will confirm. nuff said
All it proves
>is that it's text typed onto a keyboard.
>Most people can do that. They don't have to
>SC girls.
See above
>
>Show us ANY SC girl who will agree that she wants
>all her pics posted here and who will agree that
>she doesn't care a shit about DMCA and I'll
>give you ten million dollars. What's the point
>of sending emails asking them to state the
>obvious? Answer: NONE!
>
Talk about a twist of the obvious! lol.
I didn't as anything other than can she confirm the rumors were
actually truth.
Quote. 'There are now rumors on Usenet that SC have started to send
out DMCA warnings to posters of copyrighted material.
Some of those on Usenet seem to think it is a hoax!
I have pasted some examples below.
Can you confirm that that is the case?' unquote
>Now let's have no more of your damaging crap.
>We want posters, not trolls!
So if I am so insignificant, how come I am being 'damaging'.
Go ahead punk, post my SC.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 |
|