On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:33:02 +0100, WeDontBelieveTrolls
<wdbt@newsgroups.com> wrote:
>We need some logic, guys. We are in a win-win situation in this
>newsgroup. Thinking about the DMCA threats, there are two possibilities:
>
>1. They are phoney
>2. They are genuine
>
>Let's take possibility 1 as it's by far the most likely. Nobody has
>posted
>even a HINT of a threat for years and years and years and yet now we
>are seeing message after message after message. These messages all
>come from the same computer, the same news server and the same
>ISP and are all posted with 30 day trialware. So they don't have long
>left anyway to continue their campaign. Coincidentally, the recent
>post of pictures came from the same computer as above, the same news
>server as above and the same ISP as above. Some of you might raise
>an eyebrow about that. In other words, somebody has started a
>non-posting
>campaign when nobody ever started one before.
>
>Possibility 2, if believed would imply that the SC webmaster is shitting
>himself, that he is going under and on the brink of bankruptcy. No
>evidence
>of that but let's suppose it's true.
>
>
>What do we do??.........WE FLOOD, FLOOD, FLOOD, FLOOD!!
>
>If possibility 1 is correct it means we resume where we left off.
>
>If possibilty 2 is correct it means that SC has to increase the number
>of sites to break even, thereby giving us more pics to post. Also,
>coincidentally having to dig very deep for a whole shoal of
>litigations which they can't afford.
>
>Listen guys, we can't lose. It's WIN -WIN. Now then,
>who is ready to help start a flooding campaign??
Well, clever boy, start the campaign. We will follow your lead
faithfully.
|
|