"SimonSmith" <smithy@news.new> wrote:
>Absolutely spot on! At last someone has posted the truth
>about this fiasco. Nobody should be afraid to post pictures
>in pictures groups. That's exactly what usenet is for. That's
>what every Usenet pictures group is for. It's a coincidence
>that Southern Charms tightened their access security at
>precisely the time that the posts dried up - and that means
>there is now more reason to post, not less. Previously
>their sites were more or less open doors. Now that they
>are not we actually NEED the posters. Where are they
>now, these "amazing" posters? Given up because the job
>got too hard, i.e. not a complete doddle. End of story.
>
>
>
>"Reality" <reality@here.now> wrote in message news:50740D6D.70C7@here.now...
>> There never was a copyright issue, except from
>> a few of the struggling girls at Southern Charms.
>> Remember that it's the girls themselves who hold
>> the copyrights NOT the SC webmaster.
>>
>> What happened is that the main posters found that
>> they could no longer hack the SC sites. Do you
>> believe that they took out subscriptions to dozens
>> of sites? Nobody likes to admit defeat so they
>> concocted this DMCA nonsense to save face.
>>
>> Southern Charms never posted a "warning" here. If
>> they ever thought of posting anything at all it
>> would have been a plea to carry on doing their
>> free advertising for them.
>>
>> So feel free to post Southern Charms pics, especially
>> if you can hack their sites (which our main posters
>> ceased to be capable of).
>>
Sorry but both of you are wrong.
Each of the "main" posters received notice from their respective ISPs to stop
posting copyrighted material.
Unless you are the girl in the picture, you don't actually have the right to
post said pictures.
Usenet isn't for sharing other people's pictures, a group is created assuming
the poster is the owner of the content.
So please get your facts right.
Trying to get the posters in an uproar? Thinking they will post to prove you
wrong??
Fail!
If they wanted to post, they would.
|
|