Path: news.nzbot.com!border2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From: SouthernCharms@a-joke.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.southern-charms.pictures
Subject: Re: Official Southern Charms Notice
Date: 8 Sep 2012 09:02:19 -0700
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <k2fq6b02fms@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <4292s.4900$Ok1.1073@newsfe13.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a624.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes: 3635
X-Original-Bytes: 3876
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.southern-charms.pictures:11222
In article <4292s.4900$Ok1.1073@newsfe13.iad>, SC DMCA says...
>
>To Whom It May Concern:
>
>There seems to be considerable confusion concerning the removal of Southern
>Charms content from UseNet. In order to circumvent the perpetuation of what
>amounts to the blatant wholesale exploitation of the material in question,
>Southern Charms provides this official statement to enlighten you.
>
>On May 7, 2012, Southern Charms was awarded in excess of 7.1 million dollars
>in it's first copyright violation case - case # C2-10-566 by The Honorable
>Edmund A. Sargus, Jr, United States District Judge.
>
>The amount of the award was based directly upon the amount of Southern
>Charms content. UseNet currently displays more Southern Charms content than
>the offender in the lawsuit,
>
>You so eloquently describe your actions as "advertisement" that you seem to
>think Southern Charms should be in concert with, when in reality you are
>directly responsible for adversely affecting every model in every image you
>have ever uploaded to UseNet in addition to breaking the law.
>
>Be advised, as Hugh Elmwood stated, YOUR anonimity also ends with the
>billing process. By law we can and will obtain your contact information
>should any further abuse appear..
>
>Having successfully prosecuted copyright infringement, we are now seeking to
>have all Southern Charms content immediately disabled/removed from UseNet
>and any other Internet venue per DMCA law. For those who are not aware,
>from our official DMCA:
>
>"We further request that the following Southern Charms
>exclusively licensed material posted on UseNet be
>removed. Since this practice has started, it has cost us
>millions in sales. We will not allow this practice to continue. It
>is our intent to permanently remove all Southern Charms
>content from UseNet.
>
>As you nor the participants of UseNet neither
>asked for nor received permission to use Southern Charms images nor to
>make or distribute copies, including electronic copies, of
>same, you and they have willfully infringed upon our rights
>under 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq. and could be liable for
>statutory damages as high as $150,000 as set forth in
>Section 504(c)(2) therein. All of the below listed images
>are licensed exclusively to Southern Charms."
>
>That is $150,000 PER VIOLATION...
>
>Let me clarify- all of the images seen on Southern Charms are copyright
>protected and licensed exclusively to Southern Charms. Southern Charms and
>it's models will no longer tolerate the unauthorized use of it's
>intellectual properties, and will prosecute those who continue to infringe
>upon Southern Charms' copyrights..
>
>
>Regards,
>Southern Charms Tech Support
>Tech.Support@southern-charms.com
>Southern Charms DMCA
>dmca@southern-charms.com
>for Southern Charms Owner, William Wesson
>
Check it out. Southern Charms is not even registered at:
Directory of Service Provider Agents for Notification of Claims of Infringement
The U.S. Copyright Office. What a joke with all the threats.
|
|