On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:02:22 +1000, WillieWagtail
<WillieWagtail@Bilabong.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:09:55 -0700, Archie <archP@numsoft.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:02:48 +1000, WillieWagtail
>><WillieWagtail@Bilabong.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>From memory, these are "homemade" albums taken from a Blog website of
>>>quite a few years ago.
>>>
>>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:40:35 -0400, steve84 <joebo@joe.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is this the Time-Life Flower Power or a different set? Thanks
>>
>>Your "memory" fails you.
>>
>>Suggest you look at the "back" (artwork scans) for "flower Power" to see and
>>verify the publisher.
>>
>>Arch
>
>
>You are certainly right Arch.
>Somehow I mixed up the "Flower Power" series with the
>"Classic Golden Years" series currently being posted.
>Taking your advise, the current series are from 2016, where as the
>Time-Life series go back to at least 2007, so my guess would be no
>they are different .
Now I am not trying to create trouble or criticize TMD.
All his work here is much welcomed.
I was just pointing out that the "Classic Golden Years" did not appear
to be real , plastic , printed CD's.
I recall downloading some of them back when Blogspots were common and
new.
They do appear to still be around:
http://60-70rock.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/those-classic-golden-years-volume-01.html
and the "maker" of them seems to still be around (Rato) :
http://ratosreturn.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/the-best-songs-of-1969-vol-3.html
Now this is not to say that a record company compiler is any better or
worse that a Blogger at selecting tracks for an album,
I am merely pointing out the origin of the albums.
|
|