So you're the f*cking newboy mi hijo? Ya sound more like a little troll to me.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:34:24 +0100, Monotony <monotony@posts.again> wrote:
>Post-A-Lot, Crap-A-Lot, the new boy is in town
>
>On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:54:55 -0700, The Mad Doctor <tmd@ozone.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Unlike some poster who seem to be satisfied with file names
>containing ONLY
>>track# and Title... I take a lot of time (1) making sure that all
>files are
>>defined by "4 tag" file names (and very, very rarely "3 tag: names)..
>so files
>>are well defined and do not get overwritten and/or mixed. Also (2)
>my PARity
>>files are manually created (unlike those "auto" created by posting
>software
>>which can be, especially (in the case of those "2 tag" file names)
>very jumbled.
>>
>>I take care to manually arrange "most" of my posts to follow the same
>>"order".... at least the order in which they are uploaded. (I have
>no control
>>over which order any given news server handles the propagation).
>Therefore the
>>PARity files from a post from (for example) 3 weeks ago can NOT be
>confused
>>with (again for example) a recent one. The same care is given to any
>>accompanying "scans". I RAR the scan folder (rather than just upload
>"loose"
>>images because then, as I'm sure you know, you can end up with a
>dozen files
>>named (for example) Cover.jpg.
>>
>>If your news reader has a "date" column AND allows for headers to be
>sorted in
>>date (posted) order I'm sure you'll see exactly what is shown in
>those attached
>>screen captures. (actually if you DL them they should appear just
>fine on your
>>HD). There are no dupes (and I refrain from doing "re-posts" for
>just that
>>reason.
>>
>>Sorry old Pal, but in this case (after checking (a) the files on
>local HD and
>>(b) double checking on two news servers... it comes down to how your
>display is
>>sorted (unless by some chance your news provider is changing the post
>time to
>>propagation time... and I haven't seen that happen in years.
>>
>>-jack- (aka TMD, aka The Mad Doctor)
>>
|
|