Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: telanom <someone@somewhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.folk
Subject: Re: Dave Van Ronk - Inside Dave Van Ronk (1969) nmr - "00._Dave Van Ronk_-_Inside Dave Van Ronk.nfo" yEnc (1/1)
Message-ID: <6p9g4b5s40lguqpop425a440cqkihqq9ru@4ax.com>
References: <Qpu1y.49003$eE.36929@fx07.iad> <t8df4b9n2830evsetsot9nfrd6fb1bs91o@4ax.com> <h2vf4b1blptftsehr33ehbumor51acvahu@4ax.com> <ntvf4b5ptopp3j6cioh0dqj1kuh2l073ha@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 42
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:33:36 -0800
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2878453755
X-Received-Bytes: 2500
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.folk:253
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:57:26 -0800, Sawbuck <2fins4@a.sawbuck> wrote:
>telanom wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:27:17 -0800, Sawbuck <2fins4@a.sawbuck> wrote:
>>>from the .nfo
>
>snip details
>
>>>telanom, I do realize this isn't your rip, but are you able
>>>to shed some light on the discrepancy between Codec/Quality
>>>& the apparent reference to mp3 indicated in Information.
>>>
>>>Much appreciated.
>>
>>
>>Of course - I'm afraid that I had forgotten that I had made that
>>confusing reference in the nfo as I've had that album for a while..
>
>It did confound me alright.
>
>>Sadly, many albums from that time had less than steller production
>>values. So, although this album was clearly ripped the spectrograph
>>shows the quality as being around 320kbps. It is however as good as
>>you're going to find for this album.
>
>Oh yes, listening again right this minute, and it's a
>pleasure.
>
>>It has happened several times that I have ripped an album myself only
>>to find the quality very disappointing. I bought a bunch of
>>"remastered" Woody Guthrie CDs and every one of them was like that. It
>>happens...
>>
>>Frankly, I might not have uploaded this had I noticed. I only viewed
>>the audiochecker...
>
>I'm glad you didn't notice, I'm pleased to keep and listen
>and thank you kindly for your posts and patient explanation
>to my query.
>
My pleasure and more to come :)
|
|