Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Puffer Belly <anonymous@anonymous.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.24bit
Subject: Re: <- Are these Foobar Propritary? ......Yep, Not Redbook Flac ....What do you mean propritary Foobar?
Message-ID: <ll97ralk6efbrinofdl21pkbhjk7p1352u@4ax.com>
References: <BKqdnYkRB9vaiC7InZ2dnUVZ5jSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:13:16 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2515053665
X-Received-Bytes: 1806
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.24bit:832
All of the lossless formats support mono and stereo, but not all
support surround, and not all support high bit depths and high sample
rates. If you want to convert from FLAC to something else, then you
have to know what you are doing. You can rarely go wrong converting
to WAV, except you'll lose any tags. Basic information about lossless
formats can be found in Wikipedia.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:49:11 -0500, Someone <Someone@Somewhere.com>
wrote:
>Well, that is the point. Conversion between audio formats does become easier when starting with a consistant master. When introducing non-standard (hybrid) formats, mixing down becomes time consuming and tedious. Easy of use I say, standard formatting without lending to one decoder I say, and you save time not having to remix a mux. Anyway, I think that they shoud rename this group...
>
|
|