On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:48:39 -0600, "[HELL_mary]"
<kevin.moore@chromakey.org> wrote:
>In article <bnftdb9fmrtcv5c7sg71j96e440gsudtcd@4ax.com>, BreakofDay
>wrote:
>
>> You say you can't get hi res for the car and settle for mp3 Why?
>>
>> My post above says that an FM transmitter around $20 plus phone/tablet
>> with 24bit flacs (I look for 24196 for preference) played thru VLC
>> (with built in equaliser) on the device.
>> This is a value workaround for any car stereo system with an FM radio
>> in it.
>>
>> My car stereo is Hyundai which is OK. It has amarkedly better sound
>> with 2448 to 24196 and even 1644 CD quality flacs. Why stuff around
>> with mp3's
>>
>> Why wouldn't this work for you or the truck guy?
>
>Three main reasons:
>
>[1] I don't have a portable device that plays FLAC files. I do have an
>iPod that is bought and paid for so I'm not spending more on a FLAC
>player.
>
>[2] Where I live the FM bands are VERY crowded and I can't get a
>consistently clear signal. Early on, I tried about a dozen different
>transmitters with the iPod and none of them gave a satisfactory
>performance. I have it connected to the stereo's USB port via the
>digital port (not the headphone jack) on the iPod. Cleanest sound you
>can get and no static at all.
>
>[3] 320kbps MP3's sound great when there's wind, traffic, and road
>noise. I'm a high-fidelity lover at home but on the road it's usually a
>short trip and these are more than satisfactory to me.
>
>I'm very happy with this arrangement. I have no need to upgrade.
OK, solution depends on how fat your wallet is I suppose.
thanks for the reply
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|