Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:50:01 -0500
From: Gooner7 <gooner7@gooner.com>
Subject: Re: Loggins & Messina Tracks
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.dts
References: <avxnD.160467$8Z.38165@fx11.ams1>
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
git.gnome.org/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <HeSdnQdnk-RhXAPGnZ2dnUU7-f_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:50:04 -0500
Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-MBUPNfNKGJwDCFMH6pfvpC7a8jTHbtxVGl9sKx5odUjcmR8fArxTYnTFaYK00lnd5Z8BG8SFUK8JDFb!jzh14949vn2AA8q8N1Lovk5aMlMKaEzyWJw3IECJ9obUNhQvEPaDYMNuT5l6T6ciFMUDLGYyEg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2113
X-Received-Bytes: 2204
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2628076898
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sounds.dts:1276
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:43:18 +0000, EoH wrote:
> "Although the SACD mch was encoded 5.0, the center channel was
> essentially muted because the original was quad (iirc). A straight
> conversion to DTS would have no center channel (nor LFE).
> "
> THIS IS a straight conversion !! The DTS WAV's don't have a LFE and are
> just like the SACD 5.0.
> I don't really think they will make a RETAIL (!!) SACD from Quad !
> I am not quite sure what kind of point you're trying to make here !!
First, did not mean it to sound like a criticism of your post and I
apologise if taken that way. Was merely clarifying it for the person who
wondered why there was no center channel, as it was clear to me it was a
straight conversion.
Likewise, saying 'quad' may have also been an oversimplification as the
format was 5.0. However, the SACD appears to have been built using only 4
channels of information, not 5. Yes, technically that's not necessarily
'quad', but was a whole lot easier to say (and understand) than all this.
|
|