Path: news.nzbot.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx45.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sleazemovies
Subject: Re: REQ: Love Feast (1969) - TIA! Anybody find this?
From: Frog Legs <FrogLegs@tPond.org>
References: <zsOdncqUyvZh08zBnZ2dnUU7-eHNnZ2d@supernews.com> <q6b35el0eoqskr8ea0ttk51ghrv3huds4c@4ax.com> <t0e86eh57663v3jh2kel20k298e5l5j4e6@4ax.com>
Organization: The Pond
Message-ID: <XnsA9F5831CFB8C3PondPark@69.16.179.22>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 19
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsgroupdirect.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:53:20 UTC
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:53:20 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1731
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1996054441
X-Original-Bytes: 1505
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sleazemovies:5918
"The Love Feast" serves as proof that the presence of Ed Wood in any film
project was a guarantee of failure. Even in the relatively undemanding
genre of soft-core pornography, where such Wood trademarks as bizarre
dialogue, improbable plotting, and awful acting are par for the course,
this is a certifiable stinker. Despite the film's theme, and the near-
constant full-frontal nudity, there is nothing erotic, or even remotely
arousing, in this film. And that's not just my opinion- I watched this film
with a group of five people, representing both of the major genders and
various sexual orientations, and we all agreed that it was a strong
contender for the least arousing pornographic film in existence. There's
not much more to say about this film, except that after it was over I felt
sorry for Ed Wood. Even someone as talentless as he was shouldn't have to
work on such a miserable project.
|
|