On Tue, 20 May 2014 06:07:22 -0700, Roy <roy@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 19 May 2014 22:22:07 +0200, 3DCM@gmm.at wrote:
>
>>On 19 May 2014 20:06:04 GMT, Tired of morons <Braindead@home.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>why <why@not.go> wrote in news:537a1770$0$62124$c3e8da3
>>>$ff958fdc@news.astraweb.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Why don't you let H. make some money before you share her sets?
>>>>>If you share some months after first publishing it may be okay.
>>>>>Please respect the work of the models. It's not only fun :(
>>>
>>>Are you seriously this dumb or just mentally retarded?
>>>
>>>Want to know how much money H is making? Nadda, ziltch, not one penney.
>>>
>>>Whatever you are smoking put it down and get a dose of reality. These girls
>>>are exploited for $$$$ whether they realize it or not. Look at her pics and
>>>fap like the rest of us. Realize the only person making any money is the
>>>pervert behind the camera. Yes he is one of us. Only thing he is a tad
>>>smarter then us. Plus he keeps all the slips!!!!
>>>
>>
>>Do you think that the girls and their parents are stupid?
>>Maybe other photographers are paying fixed fees.
>>But the photographer of H. pays about 2-3 $ per set sold.
>
>Well if they are, they're an almost unheard of rarity, especially
>among the eastern European business model. Most of those girls are
>paid a fixed fee for each session. They take their money and that's
>it. There's no royalties that keep coming in when their sets are
>sold. The photog sells the set to places like TMTV and Silver for a
>price, TMTV/Silver then make their money, etc. The people who run the
>Silver sites have basically explained how it works several times on
>their forums. I'm not arguing whether it's wrong or right to post
>sets here, I'm just saying that in 99% of the cases, the person you're
>screwing by doing so is the end source and not the model. Post a TMTV
>or Silver set and it's those companies not making their money back for
>the sets. Now, you could argue that if enough of a model's sets are
>posted pretty soon her photog isn't making money off her anymore so
>he's going to dump her, but it always seems like there's an outlet
>will to buy sets for resale.
S.... has a mixed business model S...-A.g.ls and S...St.rl.ts contain
sets purchased completely by the agency. All other sites - one for
each photographer (with a single exception) - are sets kind of rented
by the agency where the photographers get a certain percentage of the
sales income. How much, if anything at all, of this is passed along to
the models probably is pure speculation.
|
|