Meleager <Meleager@beauty.radar> wrote in
news:da76h71n4193a09pmm4eei0j4o6huvv5et@4ax.com:
> Wow - that was quick, and very much appreciated!
>
> I'm really interested in the chronology of these sets as Robbie
> goes through his own various stages (and mutations !!) He's not
> an intuitive exhibitionist, so a lot of the impact of the sets
> must be down to the cheoreography and therefore the photographer
> (I guess). The more recent ones seem to show an "eye" less
> interested than the earlier ones, which is fascinating in its own
> right.
>
> Many thanks again.
>
> M
>
You're welcome!
And yes, the difference between the early
sets and the curret ones is obvious. It's the same with
all the models. The sets have been toned down, less eye
candy.
Someone
|
|