(in article <wJOdncnnoOpBeXzJnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
>
> Still no index maker for this machine.
>
> This is what I have. Why the original scan is there for #1 & #3,
> but not any of the others .... ??
>
> AFAIK, there never was a #6 or #8.
>
>
>
Thanks.
lucan
|
|