lucan <earl@missing.invalid> wrote in
news:0001HW.D1056923001E37D4B01029BF@news.giganews.com:
> (in article <XnsA44167C4CE2BDroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
>
>> news:XnsA44166E9639Droakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131:
>>
>>> Hopefully I can post this right.
>>>
>>> I know that this csv is not everything, but it did help me sort out
>>> some problems that I had. For instance, files with altered names:
>>> "HS-PED~1_ 0" correct name "hs-pedon-100", and "HS-PED~2_0" correct
>>> name "hs- pedon101".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> One last comment. When looking at this stuff I did not include
>> indices since they were not integral parts of any post.
>>
>> Also, I have nothing on the "Zelig Covers" included in the csv.
>>
>> Any opinions would be appreciated.
>>
>
> Here's what gnomon said when he posted this csv:
>
> -------------------------------------------
> From: gnomon <meton@an.omy>
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
> Subject: Re: (ABP) Worthies: Humbert's? 01 of 35 !index file001.jpg
> 73041Bytes - HumbertsHumbert_864.csv (1/1)
> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009
>
> Here's the csv of Humbert's Humbert's - at least what i have.
> There are some dupes, but i have not er massaged all the data yet.
>
> -gnomon
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
> I searched for one of the Zelig Covers and found it in a folder of
> stuff from the web that Humbert posted. I assume these are all just
> pics he posted, not his own work.
>
> Two Humbert scans not on the csv:
>
> bf_vbell 001.jpg (146103)
> bf_vbell 002.jpg (169292)
>
> -------------------------------------------
> From: Fawlty@towers.org ( Basil )
> Subject: New Scans <> Playing with my new Microtek i900 <-- - bf_vbell
> 001.jpg(1/1) 146103 bytes
> Organization: Que ?
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004
>
> Please Don't Cross Post to this NG ...Thank YOU !
>
> Awesome scanner . Awesome VBell to break it in
> correctly !
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
> If you don't have them, let me know and I'll repost.
>
> lucan
>
I do have the two Virginia Bell files, but they were sitting in a pile of
miscellaneous pics. I was unaware that they were Humbert scans.
Thanks for the info.
|
|