On Sat, 02 May 2009 23:06:17 -0400, " ::: D u k e :::"
<Duke@Earl.com> wrote:
>On 2 May 2009 19:51:02 -0500, Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi> wrote:
>
>>On 02 May 2009 07:48:42 GMT, Hessy <Hessy@Hessy.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is Usenet Dead? - File 02 of 55 - All photos-fd0000.jpg (1/1)
>>
>>Nice pics, but they aren't Webeweb models.
>>The reason we have different newsgroups with different topics is so
>>that people can find what they are looking for easier.
>>People who are looking for Webeweb models might look in the Webeweb
>>group for instance, and hope to find Webeweb models there.
>
>That is frikken genius right there.
>>
>>Persons looking for games might look in a games group, those looking
>>for music could look in a music group and find music there.
>>Lets suppose you like a variety of different music and the general
>>music group suits your tastes perfectly, but some others only like
>>classical, some only like rock, some only like country.
>
>This is amazing. I love country music.
>>
>>What you are doing is the same as if you posted rock music in a group
>>that was created for country music.
>>Sure, there may be one or two that like rock as well as country, but
>>most would appreciate it if you kept your rock music in the rock group
>>and left the country music group for those who are looking for country
>>music.
>
>What would one do if it was like a crossover song that was a little bit country and a little bit
>rock ?
>>
>>You should be posting your material in a group that is either
>>specifically for the type of material that you are posting, OR a group
>>that is for a variety of different material.
>>You should not be posting your material in a group that has a very
>>specific topic like Webeweb.
>>
>>... And the answer to your question is No, usenet is not dead.
>Paddy
>
>I do admire your patience in answering his post.
>
>I suspect he already knows this information as he has been shopping this material all over the
>groups for a couple years now.
>
>I think he may actually be an anti and is making some kind of statement, but I am too dumb to figure
>it out.
He obviously craves attention/approval for his material, so it's not
that far-fetched to think he could be persuaded to go where he might
be considered a productive contributor rather than a nuisance like he
is here.
Surely you don't think Hessy is a proper troll now do you?
Oh, and by the way, I think there is a group for the Osmonds where
crossover songs are posted.
|
|
')){kind=link}