Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-08.inet.qwest.net!195.114.241.69.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:11:06 -0500
From: jorj <jorj@hea.ven>
Subject: Re: Ping jorj - About Digital watermarks, with examples -
"Jenna_digimarked_level1.jpg" 721.9 KBytes yEnc
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
References: <KfSdnWDo3u2PwF_XnZ2dnUVZ8lQAAAAA@giganews.com>
<hLGdnRjwepqGB1_XnZ2dnUVZ_hxi4p2d@giganews.com>
<Xns9C9613A27AAE0MrD.email.org@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <hLGdnRvwepq3LV_XnZ2dnUVZ_hxi4p2d@giganews.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:11:06 -0500
Lines: 103
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-2T9v2hLpVDsRC6vKBWh+oINCAxl69v8qBV25eLqDzohBs0Idsmddz7S7DRGPNqxFE89rRkiNS3l9gjZ!WVOyouK67P9qOtzoSf1TrTYbXTtD2hI33kf0ICPubScyMwM2BgOF73UX+nGBZcW9RtnYHTGYgaw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:1090
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:56:12 +0000, MrD wrote:
> jorj <jorj@hea.ven> wrote in
> news:hLGdnRjwepqGB1_XnZ2dnUVZ_hxi4p2d@giganews.com:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:17:19 +0000, NottyBrother wrote:
>>
>>> Here you have jenna.jpg, I nice girl I met online. This photo is the
>>> reference an is not digitally watermarked
>>>
>>> The other photos are the same picture but watermarked, each one with a
>>> different strength.
>>>
>>> Level 1 is less visible but less durable Level 4 is more visible but
>>> more durable.
>>>
>>> I inserted a Transaction code "69696969"
>>>
>>> You can read This transaction code with in several ways:
>>>
>>> If you have Photoshop CS4, use the Digimarc plugging. you can also use
>>> the executable I am posting, and run read watermarks from context menu
>>> in explorer (if you don't trust me, what I fully understand, you can
>>> download it free from Digimarc site.)
>>>
>>>
>>> I removed in all images all metadata, like EXIF, XMP, Photoshop meta,
>>> etc.. even the thumbnail so it will not be an issue when comparing the
>>> files.
>>>
>>> As you will be able to see, digitally watermarking CHANGES the color
>>> of pixels of the image.
>>>
>>> feel free to crop, resize, etc and check for yourself if you can have
>>> get watermarks removed without destroying the picture...
>>>
>>> In my tests, long time ago, with a 1200dpi wax color printer and a
>>> 1200 dpi scanner, the digital watermarked survived after I printed
>>> the photo and scanned it.
>>>
>>> Any doubt, fell free to reply please... After all this is ALSO a
>>> discussion group :-)
>>>
>>> With all respect,
>>
>> See?
>>
>> Webe did not use digimarc. I never said they did. Also (here it is
>> again.. ready?) I NEVER SAID I REMOVED THE FUCKING WATERMARK. Remember
>> when I said that before? Oh, that's the part you didn't bother to
>> read... just like you probably won't read it again this time.
>>
>> Meh.
>>
>> I said there was a way to flood the server and cause it to dump
>> UNWATERMARKED pictures. I know this and I know how watermarked pics
>> from them look, because I wrote the fucking software to do what I
>> already told you I did.
>>
>> You're an idiot for assuming I don't know what I am talking about.
>>
>> You're an idiot for assuming you do.
>>
>> You're an idiot for assuming everyone uses digimarc.
>>
>> You're an idiot because you assume when I say webe watermarked their
>> shit I said they used digimarc - I said no such thing.
>>
>> You're an idiot because you obviously didn't read what I said, you just
>> saw one thing you could disagree with then right back trying to prove
>> AGAIN that I could not do something I never said I did.
>>
>> You're an idiot because you obviously are more interested in talking
>> than listening. Then you try to cover it up telling me "respect."
>> Bullshit, you didn't politely disagree you simply said I was wrong -
>> when, in fact, it's you who is entirely in the wrong here. Of course
>> you will never admit it - but then again, I will never care so we're
>> even.
>>
>> Feel free to visit March on the better servers and grab the
>> "kleenXBuMod" bunny sets 63,64,65. I'm the one who grabbed those off
>> webe's servers and I'm the one who wrote the code that did it. Do
>> compare these to any other sets of that range you find. If you'd care
>> to disagree further about what constitutes a watermark, feel free to
>> reply to someone who cares. I said way too much already, but I doubt
>> Goldberg or Greene or whatever his name is is gonna be coming after me
>> for infringment.
>>
>>
> wow - and i thought i was the bad guy :)
Of course you are. We all are. Where YOU been?
> Quote:
> "Of course you will never admit it - but then again, I will never care
> so we're even."
>
> Yet you rant off as if you do actually ... care ;)
I care only about myself. It pleases me to be a dick.
No, we are not what we eat.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1090h', 'Re: Ping jorj - About Digital watermarks, with examples - "Jenna_digimarked_level1.jpg" 721.9 KBytes yEnc')){kind=link}