admin <nogood@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:j2v6dep513qm401f238efc5pbooanr4lgg@4ax.com:
> On 8 May 2019 12:03:39 -0700, Mustang@NewsGuy.Com wrote:
>
>>In article <3MOzE.12283$Nl6.9845@fx03.ams1>, cutoboy says...
>>>
>>>please give us the PW.
>>>Simple as that.
>>>
>>>
>>You may find your answers at FReasternproductions.com (hint, wink,
>>toe-tapping). Not to lodge any complaints as CD is a terrific poster,
>>but I do miss Swarmer's posts as they were a little more spicy.
>>Thanx to our good friend and jolly chap Admin for the uncovering of this
>>somewhat perplexing PW. It caused me to waste several pints and I
>>overlooked 3 hookers while desperately trying to crack the code.
>>Cheers
>
> Thanks, but the credit is not mine. GreatfulLurker posted a six-part
> attachment of an picture that had the required studio name watermarked
> on the image. It was obvious, then, we needed the full name with
> proper caps and site extension.
>
> That may be a good way to handle it in the future - download an image
> that contains the needed password.
>
Thanks for the credit, admin. I just thought by posting that pic with the
studio logo so prominent, it might be a rather obvious hint, without really
saying so. Wasn't thinking to start a new "trend" of posting images with
PWs. But that really might work. Even could possibly use "any" image and
edit it to have a password pasted on the original image. That way it would
be easily available, but not in a plain text format. Interesting idea. Or
not.
I've attached an example to this message
GreatfulLurker
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
|