In article <tn6qcepdopj1obtvajqmpu4tn61pkbb1n0@4ax.com>,
nogood@sbcglobal.net says...
>
> On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:05:22 -0500, "lurkin@your.newsgroup"
> <nomail@right.now> wrote:
>
> >CatLover <catlover@gmx.com> wrote in
> >news:part1of1.1.Si$$krn9dymxLw@ue.ph:
> >
> >> Count <CountDrakulol@Transylvania.com> wrote:
> >>>No cars today.
> >>>PW refers to one of the two photo studio.
> >>>CD
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>----------------------------------------- --- -- -
> >>>Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
> >>>Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
> >>>------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -
> >>
> >> Over the years many Gigabytes of files are lost forever because of
> >> passworded files
> >> and giving the passwords only to regulars.
> >>
> >
> >i've been a lurker sometimes contributer for many years. there have been a
> >few standard ways to set passwords. but the guessing game always sux for
> >everyone. <plonk>
>
> You are right. I also hope he'll stop preceding the subject with
> the part count, e.g [xx/yy], which causes all the 01s to sort together
> by subject, then the 02s, etc. Append it to the end of the subject
> (which already has a 'partxx' to keep it in order), or drop it
> altogether.
I can't believe it, one shoot of 500 pictures made at the same location
voluntarily split in seven sets, shrinked or jpeg-ed to dead and
passworded with 21 digits, don't waste time and bandwidth on it, try to
get the 37 original sets plus those out of kids of the shadow.
grandpa
|
|