| Re: I don't understand it, but some like it. NN |
YouTuber |
| YouTuber (You@Tube.com) |
2018/08/15 09:41 |
"lurkin@your.newsgroup" <nomail@right.now> wrote in
news:VtOdnYJS9dlLVu7GnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com:
> YouTuber <You@Tube.com> wrote in news:XnsA93EEA1E2E85AYoutubercom@
> 69.16.179.60:
>
>> "lurkin@your.newsgroup" <nomail@right.now> wrote in
>> news:2uadnSkS2758me_GnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>>> YouTuber <You@Tube.com> wrote in
>>> news:XnsA93D7B0A01956Youtubercom@69.16.179.60:
>>>
>>>> Jahan <jahan@somewhere.something.mars> wrote in
>>>> news:zIdcD.4826$mn.371 @fx25.iad:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 03:18:19 -0500, lurkin@your.newsgroup wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> YouTuber <You@Tube.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:XnsA93CD15E16EAFYoutubercom@69.16.179.60:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "lurkin@your.newsgroup" <nomail@right.now> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:M82dnd73BKapbPLGnZ2dnUU7-VvNnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> instagram: kelseydancer5678
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> she's cute :3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> federal USA Law requires that you believe that what has been
>>>>>>> posted does not violate local or federal law - the emphasis is on
>>>>>>> local law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't believe the US laws you're referring too have any
>>>>>> jurisdiction over me. unless the US now forces their laws on other
>>>>>> countries.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the safest way to post in the environment of today is to open a You
>>>> Tube account and post your video there if You Tube does not
>>>> automatically not allow it - it means it passes the copyright act.
>>>> So go into settings and make the video private. In a jam you can
use
>>>> that as a defense unless what is posted is really realy graphic
>>>>
>>>
>>> ???
>>> how about no.
>>> i'm not going to go through all that trouble to post a simple video.
>>> the US doesn't dictate what i can and cannot do. i'm sorry if you are
>>> suffering these constraints, plase don't try to force them on me.
>>
>> I posted before I read this post - I am not trying to force anything
on
>> you - I am simply explaining that if a US Prosecutor wants badly
enough
>> they can apply US Law anyplace in the world that has an extradiction
>> treaty with the US
>>
>
> if your "US Prosecutor" comes by maybe we'll have tea.
> i don't know all the history of the US, but i know they were in a big
> fight with england over laws forced on them without representation in
> making those laws. i guess you're just trying to inform me of
something,
> but your US laws have nothing to do with me.
> you're making yourself seem very guilty of something though i'm not
> precisely sure of what yet. perhaps you should ask those prosecutors to
> have a talk with you and find out exactly what's going on with your
> suspicious behavior.
>
Course not - the general principle in the US is that you have a lawful
right to have dirty thoughts or a dirty mind but you have no right to
impose that on someone else. In 1935 The Supreme Court ruled that nudity
was legal and that publications that depicted nude people were absolutely
protected by the Constitution
|
|
|