"rockin' troll" <troll@underbridge.ru> wrote in
news:XnsA9326B027F3F7ajwe843ojihuiopopeq0@138.199.68.130:
>
>
>> OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote
>
>> I do not care because the material posted is sensitive but not
>> unlawful. If I post a preview pic and you decide to download based on
>> the pic - USA Law holds that a Coke can may be pornographic if you
>> believe Coke cans turn you on - I will not provide you with porn
>> materisl
>
> US Law says no such thing about a Coke can. It all has to do with
> community stanards. In "grey areas", such as a partially clothed
> child, the jury might be persuaded of the "intent" of the accused.
>
> But a Dr Pepper can? Hmmm :)
>
I said a coke can as an illustration of what US Law holds. A fetish of
something can be described as pornographic - rather than talk all day I
will just say this - a foot fetish which is a mainstream fetish so if I
post ladies shoes in a benign way to me as I like fashion - your fetish
is to place your male part inside that shoe - it is now porn if I posted
at your request ladies shoes
|
|