cowbell <cowbell@dairy.farm> wrote in
news:9unmc8lkn96v6k3bpavjeelavp1l333oqb@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:32:07 -0600, Saul Rothard <never@no.mo> wrote:
>
> Nothing, for your personal use. Now, there are two different files,
> the original and your compressed version, out there on the internet.
> You could be a "good" poster and rename your file as being altered so
> collectors would be aware that your file is not the original. As it
> stands, your version is the equivalent of spam that inevitably shows
> up to everyones' detriment.
>
> -- cb
>
spam? SPAM?? You got nerve! Calling spam a single pic demonstrating an
alternate way to post. A series of pics posted at close to 4 Mb each pic
is very impolite to the group.
If you really believe what you wrote, you got a lot to learn about
usenet. "Collectors" with half a brain can read and see this is a
smaller copy of an original post.
And who are you? Did you just change your nick? All the years I been
Lurking (yes I am a shameless lurker) I never heard of you.
Have a nice day!
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.totty/7561', 'Re: What's wrong with just a little compression? - "becca10_204.jpg" 340.7 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}