On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:35:20 -0700, Odibil <od@nospam.net> wrote:
>I'm usually good at spotting that sort of thing. But what? I see no
>photoshop. Ya could maybe think it was on the bra, but it is folded,
>check the next pic. Aside from that, this pic is one of the gems!
See the lower crotch area at 100% zoom. It's disgraceful what they
did. Better they should have omitted the photo altogether.
I suck at posting binaries, but I'll try to attach a zoomed-in
version.
>
>In article <501431c0$0$1581$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com>,
>somefooker <somefooker@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>> Fucking egregious Photoshopping. What the hell are they thinking at AMS?
>>
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.totty/7455', 'Re: AMS Cherish #140 "IMG_6936.JPG" yEnc')){kind=link}