swarmer <swrmr@ontheroad.net> wrote in
news:XnsA085D27AA6C6Bswrmrontheroadnet@216.151.153.44:
> Nephilim <return@forever.com> wrote in
> news:lcs1v71v7mq1u4mesg97ps3b50v77erttj@4ax.com:
>
>> On 01 Jul 2012 18:44:57 GMT, rod <rod@dpj.ru> wrote:
>>
>>>Is this bullshit...sets I haven't seen before but I'm suspicious that
>>>it's a ripoff. (ultra.dreamcaster.info/index.html) Anyone know?
>>
>>
>> Hi there rod (nic rings a bell) ;-)
>>
>> I went to look...
>> The 33 samples on the index page show nothing "new". All are from the
>> original site. The site says it has 1450 pix. AFAIK, the original
>> site had 39 sets with a total of 2340 pix. I've heard there are some
>> unpublished sets floating around, but I'll believe THAT when I see
>> some, ;-) (I'd like to!)
>
> Based on the preview sets for this new site, there are definitely sets
> that have never been seen. Whether or not the samples are actual photo
> sets is a chance one would have to take. This sample shows at least six
> sets we've never seen, and they are on the new site, plus a couple more
> I've never seen. Site subscription is through NNPay, which has never
> been a problem for me, and I've always used pre-paid CC's. If you are
> truly an Ultra fan take the plunge and see what you (we :-)) get.
>
> begin 644 128439566586_onionib.jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: 128439566586_onionib.jpg
> `
> end
>
>
Hello swarmer,
I value your comments and respect you as a poster however this site
doesn't pass the "stink test". Therefore I'm inclined to agree with
Nephilim. I believe the sets we have not seen are in fact made up of sample
files that have been floating around for months. I think the last few sets
probably have 10 to 12 of these sample (size 100kb or less) pics in them.
I'm convinced this site is a honey trap intended for people who think with
their dicks, only a fool would sign up. I notice that you haven't ponied up
your hard earned dough, if it were legitimate I would not hesitate and of
course share the wealth. rod
|
|