On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:47:21 -0800, Odibil <od@nospam.net> wrote:
>Indeed, as I acknowledged in the post, it was a weird way of doing it.
>But to post the pars would have been 9 separate posts and I am lazy.
>Besides, it worked! I was surprised the rar didn't make it in its
>entirety, that is the first time I have seen that happen. I will try
>this one now since it is ready and if necessary do smaller ones in
>future.
>
>
Thanks for the repost. Part of MY problem with original post is my
reader, "Agent". It stops joining multi-part posts at the missing
part. :-( So.... if the missing part is toward the begining of the
file, it takes MANY pars to repair. If the missing part of the file is
toward the end, like part 200 of 232, no problem.
Thanks again. ;-)
|
|