On 08 May 2011 05:08:27 GMT, Stranger <M8R-0fg9gl@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in
>news:n28cs65fs5q81qd45n6lt7b6rqvhtcins7@4ax.com:
>
>> On 08 May 2011 02:15:32 GMT, swarmer <swarmer@thehive.net> wrote:
>>
>>>If you can't decipher the subtlties of usnet go back to 4chan. There
>>>are plenty of groups to post shit that's been reposted a thousand
>>>times. This is not one of them. Please, we have an interesting little
>>>drama going on in this group. We don't need it flooded with MF.
>>>
>> Are you sure these have been posted before? I don't think so. These
>> sets don't match previously posted sets by set number, or any other.
>> (As compared by image recognition software). Can you prove otherwise?
>>
>
>I guess it's true what they say - YOU CAN'T PLEASE THEM ALL!
>I would have RAR'd all this to compact the list, but for those who like
>to see an image or two to know exactly what they are getting I am doing
>things the way that I am. Guess some people dislike courtesy and
>kindness! heh heh
>As for why these do NOT match some MF posts, there have been many
>INCORRECT POSTS. I'm doing the world a favor, I think. Now, if Mr. Totty
>asked me to post elsewhere, certainly I would comply! Until then, for
>those who want CORRECT MF SETS, I will provide WIH.
>Yours truly,
>the Stranger
>
>ps: HELLO SWARMER! i am a big fan of yours!
My point was that these appear to be new. I think you misread me.
|
|