Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!news.alt.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.sonicnet!news.posted.sonicnet.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 23:50:28 -0500
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty
Subject: Re: Stranger=plonk
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 21:50:36 -0700
Message-ID: <n28cs65fs5q81qd45n6lt7b6rqvhtcins7@4ax.com>
References: <Xns9EDEE385898AAswarmerthehivenet@198.186.190.224>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110507-1, 05/07/2011), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 10
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-6BBaJZGjj1m7GAkmvFWJnfyglWIj5/fLXh7tBhlfzmFfJYXMkxqVF5X8yWJmyO85/2ZHNsZKuE9nChL!nyRhUtjFazJGUCNNVRivcbItEILVInU4pvJAJrSYB0fqOZyV/l56D9kj8RkJYu/OEO3VlEXpnYia!x+H5A1wFEQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca-agent@sonic.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1704
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty:6459
On 08 May 2011 02:15:32 GMT, swarmer <swarmer@thehive.net> wrote:
>If you can't decipher the subtlties of usnet go back to 4chan. There are
>plenty of groups to post shit that's been reposted a thousand times. This
>is not one of them. Please, we have an interesting little drama going on in
>this group. We don't need it flooded with MF.
>
Are you sure these have been posted before? I don't think so. These
sets don't match previously posted sets by set number, or any other.
(As compared by image recognition software). Can you prove otherwise?
|
|