<Tottie.Inspector@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:57:57 -0500, Abner <abr@abr.net> wrote:
>
>><beautifulfly@way.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:10:53 -0500, Abner <abr@abr.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You might want to take a look at all the even sets from 40 on up in
>>>>yer Starlola post. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>BTW, one reason I didn't check them was cause my pc's running so slow
>>>with only one stick of memory right now. So I can post a proper
>>>apology, is it just the even pics, and is it just maxwell pics that
>>>replaced them?
>>
>>I think it's some of the odd sets also. Over half were Maxwell gals.
>>Didn't bother me. Just thought I'd let you know.
>
>
>Ah shit.. I have an original site rip when the site first opened and
>the webmonsters and I quote said " We applogize but Lola is having
>health problems so we arranged to bring you some special models while
>she recovers " yeah right we get Maxwell crap intersperced inbetween
>the real set's all the while those shitheads could have saved us all a
>butt load of time and just posted what they had and closed/retired the
>site .. BUT no they had to go and string everyone along.. this is one
>I dropped and never looked back at after the first few continuations
>of the featured model..
>
>
>
>
>TI
So this is how the site posted the sets? And I shouldn't blame the
poster?
|
|