On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:53:53 GMT, "Deadly" <Deadly@NoEmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 6-May-2010, My@Stars.com wrote:
>
>> Gallery 24
>
>HiYa *MyStars*
>
>Sorry, I didn't even think to compare those
>to her "baby" sets. I only checked the "kinder"
>sets, and the sets from "AMS". But, I guess
>there is still a slight difference... I mean, the
>pictures are the same, but the logo's are
>different. I think they did that intentionaly,
>just to confuse ME !!! LOL :o)
>
>Thanks for your troubles, and for setting it
>straight. Again, sorry about that.
>
>Take Care
>~Deadly
Ya, that's why I sent the link to The Forever Models site, That
appears to be where the "Playtoy Baby" sets were re-issued with the
new Cherish logo. (if you've ever seen the directory structure of that
site, they have the sets divided by the girl's initial, which explains
why you might have them as 1, 2, and 3).
At first I thought that was indeed evidence that there was originally
a "Kinder model" site, and my confidence in my memory was reeling. But
I knew I'd seen those sets before, I was thinking some type of guest
appearance. Then I rememebered the Forever site, they re-issued lots
of Playtoy sets, and sure enough, galleries 18, 27, and 37 at
http://forever.artmodelingstudios.com/tour2.html are the Cherish
model sets in question. And oddly enough I think it helps confirm my
suspicions that her site was indeed always called Cherish.
Becasue as I remember, Chersih was one of the last Playtoy models to
become an AMS model, and I believe she was already named Cherish on
the Forever modeling studio site, so they may have been planning on
naming her Kinder when they opened her site, but I believe they
already decided (rightfully so) that Cherish was better suited for
her.
|
|
 1 file - "IMG_3926.JPG" yEnc (1/2) - IMG_3926.JPG')){kind=link}