On 11 Mar 2010 00:35:33 GMT, Scruffy <Scruffy@Mutt.co.uk> wrote:
>
>i almost want to get pissed at your arrogance. i did label 2 sets site 2, which actually are from her first site, not the current one but irrelevant. as far as the sets labeled wrong, possible, but i doubt it. one more thing, the sets labeled "archive" are labeled that way when you BUY them from the site, obviously something you know nothing about. so sit back enjoy the fruits of someone elses labor and SHUT THE FUCK UP.
It was a perfect post as far as I could tell, Thanks again, pure gold
as far as I'm concerned. If he d/l's it all it will make sense, I've
never seen the first 20 or so archives before, this post was
priceless.
I noticed your header mentioning Edik, I might have missed something,
but I don't think I've seen edik post since early December. I hope you
weren't posting for the benefit of a poster that may have moved on.
I am sure I am not the only one who greatly appreciated your efforts.
Thanks again Scruffy!
|
|