On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:22:21 -0500, "V@RTEX" <blackhole@cygnus.x1>
In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
>
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:12:47 -0600, aussie bob <aussie@hotmail.com>
> In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
> >
> > "V@RTEX" <blackhole@cygnus.x1> wrote in
> > news:1k3ak55mr365koau4h56rq7vkmg30oi4um@4ax.com:
> >
> > > Not a photoshop job - a byte perfect correction. The corruption was
> > > basically a duplication within the file of 9104 bytes @x20000
> > > (resulting in four nips) which I have excised using a sector editor.
> > > Since this is proved to be a reversion to the original before
> > > corruption rather than a revision or repair (to like-new), it is not
> > > renamed but should replace that previously distributed corrupt file in
> > > all collections, reposts and CSVs.
> > >
> > > begin 644 juliette-special-013-051.jpg
> > >
> > > Attachment decoded: juliette-special-013-051.jpg
> > > `
> > > end
> >
> > Any chance of posting the ful set....PLEASE!
> >
> > Aussie bob
>
> Why are you on Giganews if you are not going to use it?
>
> If you retrieve all headers in this group, they go back to 2008-10-25.
> On 2008-11-09 an NZB was posted. (So you don't need all 1.7 million, just
> 20 or 30,000 from the oldest.)
>
> Although the headers farther back cannot be retrieved, the bodies go back
> to 2008-08-08. The fortuitous NZB will give you the headers you need for
> the RAR containing 1-11 posted in early Oct 2008. 12 and 13 were posted
> later. For those, you can get an NZB from binsearch.info.
>
> Sorry, but I prefer to teach men to fish :-)
Ah, sorry again. 1-11 were reposted 2008-11-27.
13 was posted 2009-03-04 and reposted by MFG in June.
12 is unposted but can be found on the web.
|
|
){kind=link}