On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:12:47 -0600, aussie bob <aussie@hotmail.com>
In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
>
> "V@RTEX" <blackhole@cygnus.x1> wrote in
> news:1k3ak55mr365koau4h56rq7vkmg30oi4um@4ax.com:
>
> > Not a photoshop job - a byte perfect correction. The corruption was
> > basically a duplication within the file of 9104 bytes @x20000
> > (resulting in four nips) which I have excised using a sector editor.
> > Since this is proved to be a reversion to the original before
> > corruption rather than a revision or repair (to like-new), it is not
> > renamed but should replace that previously distributed corrupt file in
> > all collections, reposts and CSVs.
> >
> > begin 644 juliette-special-013-051.jpg
> >
> > Attachment decoded: juliette-special-013-051.jpg
> > `
> > end
>
> Any chance of posting the ful set....PLEASE!
>
> Aussie bob
Why are you on Giganews if you are not going to use it?
If you retrieve all headers in this group, they go back to 2008-10-25.
On 2008-11-09 an NZB was posted. (So you don't need all 1.7 million, just
20 or 30,000 from the oldest.)
Although the headers farther back cannot be retrieved, the bodies go back
to 2008-08-08. The fortuitous NZB will give you the headers you need for
the RAR containing 1-11 posted in early Oct 2008. 12 and 13 were posted
later. For those, you can get an NZB from binsearch.info.
Sorry, but I prefer to teach men to fish :-)
|
|
){kind=link}