Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-08.inet.qwest.net!195.114.241.69.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.173.12.MISMATCH!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Organization: Cuntwhorshinists & Jeerleaders, Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/4.2.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Paula Model - 1 attachment
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty
Reply-To: tart-i-ness@all-times-high.com
References: <98ifm.82712$8l4.34472@newsfe10.iad> <Xns9C61EB080B46ratTR17@216.196.97.130>
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <zkwfm.451886$op1.407294@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 02:06:39 -0700
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty:2278
> hmmm <hmm@hm.com> wrote in news:98ifm.82712$8l4.34472@newsfe10.iad:
>
> Her website (paula-model.com) definitely has some very "compelling"
> preview images. I don't know about paying $39.90 for a monthly
> subscription, but I'd think long and hard if it were just $19.90. I
> often wonder if setting a cheaper price would encourage more
> subscriptions.
>
> Anyway ...
>
> Paula's style of posing seems almost identical to several others featured
> here lately, almost like the webmasters are following a specific formula
> to capture our attention. Not that I'm complaining or anything. I very
> much like this style.
>
> I'm simply wondering how many of these "cookie-cutter" models are going
> to be trotted out for our approval, and whether or not such repeated
> exposure will eventually numb us (or, at least, me in particular) to
> their "charms". Much like seeing normal girls in short shorts (just
> short enough to be decent) barely even registers a second look any more.
>
> Yes, I know that this is not a discussion group, but I'm hoping that a
> few folks might be willing to offer some meaningful responses.
>
> -rat-
I like much more to see very "skimpy" clothed posing with the occasional
"oops", I 'specially like it when their bums are "featured" and can get a
glimpse of the "sphincter wrinkles" while the other en-TRANCE to the eventual
Love Canal for some lucky S.O.B. someday is exposed a bit too ...
Once a cutie goes all bare in thee "custom" sets, it's interesting BUTTposing
in the skimpiest of whatever is much more fun to "thumb-thru" ; ) IMVHO of
course. BUTTeye never get tired of any of the real cute ones that aren't in
any way shy and enjoy giving us "slips" on purpose, Gaja comes to mind, those
ones know god damn well what goes where and why and love the teasing so why
not enjoy their inhibitions? Fuck uptight society, fuck 'em all...I love
women, girls, the H-W-P female frame is the most attractive and stunning
thing on earth AFAIAC...
BUTTTake Paula here for example, let's be frank and honest, she's not
cute-cute as doll-facers go BUTTshe poses extremely well which gives her
"overall cuteness" high marks...I've seen some doll-faces turn out to
top-notch mutts too so Paula most certainly has a chance to grow up to be a
stunner all-over, BUTTThen what if she gets really hot from the neck up then
pulls a "Cherry"?, JFC Cherry got so frickin' big I'd be deathly afraid to
give 'er a good pokin', she looks as if she got pissy with 'er lover during
the nasty she's probably strong enough to literally pinch yer' dick off with
her privates -lol
I hope no photogs or webmasters see this post, I wouldn't want to give 'em
any ideas ~ : b...
|
|