Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:06:36 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty
Subject: Re: Art Modeling Studio intimidation?
From: Professor Anthrax <panthrax@harvard.edu>
References: <ILidnZYN1PGyY-zXnZ2dnUVZ8kednZ2d@giganews.com> <Xns9C5EF387A791Cpanthraxharvardedu@216.196.97.131> <k5vk755rd05i0bbo1e2r6v1omrt8faaas4@4ax.com> <2eudneiJs4Tzb-fXnZ2dnUVZ8sCdnZ2d@giganews.com> <Xns9C5FB207BABEDMrD.email.org@127.0.0.1> <070820090033083553%HP@snotmail.com> <Xns9C5FBF114776panthraxharvardedu@216.196.97.131> <070820091200081775%HP@snotmail.com>
Organization: Harvard University
Message-ID: <Xns9C6133FD27F6Bpanthraxharvardedu@216.196.97.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
X-Face: )W3weGfhHU'yEONTg*H1+'C!)D'/#noH$ici;-w^IKKh.>y@2N5#yt3so2{V.l@epMQpgUf y-@8,X{~.UiWx-u(~%'|8|RvT\V1b92ellG~iyzY]w'okrb=`pY,:0$3=Q"$H/&!:{$fZx5-"]9M/p |F7Qfx;Gmd_XNx,*jgol.dsaXN@eZq{`wAH+PEuz4N~-&%*yPf{cr4j'"nDF+yHpF
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:06:36 -0500
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-sA7JkDG/Z4KM4jSUSxKC9+V7caH2v6wbkgIM3CuMUqkkVZh0yH8zVlSzcAo+H+8Bp1S25Xc3zwL2Jv3!9c0jTjaxh4/R2qiyfGESyWW1B2F1iw7CMsD1SMG8YR4wxSuMl5mxegNxc7UfInIYdszFWkqEkXhb!kzQ=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty:2265
High Priest <HP@snotmail.com> wrote in
news:070820091200081775%HP@snotmail.com:
> Professor, ad hominems are not my style, except in the case of
> unreconstructed morons and trolls. You are neither.
>
> You were right, I was half wrong and I apologize. Yes, it looks as
> though I did not read far enough.
>
> My lack of sufficient technical knowledge was the reason I did not
> post early in the first case. I later chose to offer a tentative and
> qualified opinion. Now, in a way, I'm glad to learn that my opinion
> was wrong because I rather hope the technology to do this does exist.
>
> I want to learn more about how it works in practice though, and will
> continue to await input from the webmaster in question.
>
> Meanwhile, as a former webmaster myself, I regret to report one reason
> just last week, there were some changes to Russia's laws. I must find
> out more in this department, too. I will probably post the findings in
> Yardbird.
Thank you. That was a very gracious answer and indicates that you are a
person of honesty and honor. Very rare on usernet.
--
Professor Anthrax B.A., Ph.D, A+, CCNA, Net+, and lots of BS
-------------------------
"You kids get out of my classroom...NOW!"
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|