Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty
Subject: Re: Tottie is greatest idiot, as...
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:20:19 -0800
Message-ID: <37jpm4pbe7lvucas0ja0q9q3d4ikocmu3t@4ax.com>
References: <J5Gdnfo54_KyJfbUnZ2dnUVZ8sTinZ2d@giganews.com> <ljgnm4heuchu1hbu75p2claea4orulffsm@4ax.com> <Xns9B92204CD4A5Fnumo@216.196.97.142>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171 trialware
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 19
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 708eaaad.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=COEk\QO7XA5J0Z]=gbPP29L?0kYOcDh@:_d>jF6@cXi5KK@ZXKiklK5a3_3ZbaX4h1Yb\1YT0;09<I`hN]cFTHJ5
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty:1141
Point being, anyone with a passing interest knows that the LEA and IWF
are the culprits, not one individual posting select sets and site rips
to a single channel in usenet.
The idea that someone would point a finger at someone in the
underground as the one to blame is entirely laughable.
When I read it initially, i actually did laugh out loud, and then
proceeded to verbally what the fuck bbq own his dumb ass.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:10:30 -0600, numo <numo@nowhere> wrote:
>
>> You are right, I do disagree with you. I imagine given time I can
>> think of thousands of reasons they began censoring the sites.
>
>It's true. I've mentioned before how the early Newstar sets were edgier
>than the current ones, to give an example.
|
|