alt.binaries.pictures.totty.repostPrev. Next
Re: Lolly Outdoors set 94 - 57 files - "IMG_5202.JPG" yEnc (1/2) Unlimited download news ..
Millard Filmore (hibbert@jackson.county.org) 2015/01/23 22:22

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: Millard Filmore <hibbert@jackson.county.org>
Subject: Re: Lolly Outdoors set 94 - 57 files - "IMG_5202.JPG" yEnc (1/2)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.totty.repost
References: <Part1of2.60CF4600E0C44E4084050E4751F50D30@1420112408.local>
 <210120150921170499%Vladimir@RedSquare.ru>
User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 926a150
 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 24 Jan 2015 05:22:29 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <54c32c15$0$6811$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com>
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6839430a.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=ITRGeCdT3:AMnc]O[a9m]EL?0kYOcDh@Jj1fLP;=[R]O4B81KWZLGd@HaBM;?2>?j@YWSCEQmR_kB0`B^7RkjR?K]go7ZHlh>SBXj5@W=U@AWF
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.totty.repost:1395

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:21:17 +1300, Vladimir wrote:

> In article <Part1of2.60CF4600E0C44E4084050E4751F50D30@1420112408.local>,
> Tam O'Shanter <tos@erins.greensod> wrote:
>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=554570 name=IMG_5202.JPG
>
>
> You know what's amusing (and should be of interest to the photographer)
> ‹ of lesser interest to the poster, probably
>
> Pictures like this (and many others of course) probably offend against
> US law even though the girl is not naked. (Note I am not complaining,
> only commenting ‹ as a person who used to be immersed in such matters).
> I often used to wonder why a photographer would risk his liberty by
> making such a picture yet stop short of making it a "money shot" by
> doing it naked, which probably is what almost everyone really wants and
> which would not get him into water that was any hotter if he did.
>
> Does anyone know who the photographer was? He surely would not like to
> disclose his identity in here but  I would like to converse with him at
> some point.

why do you suspect the photographer is in a jurisdiction where he would
care about US laws?

Follow-ups:12
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite