In article <1h2gt9doh9us83forofgv0cr3cts9lluci@4ax.com>, OddBALL says...
>
>On 29 Jul 2014 11:11:18 -0700, model.fan
><model.fan_member@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <dtnet95j84anl0mhl5kfj59s2uluvd9doa@4ax.com>, elonafan@almaty.city
>>says...
>>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:05:42 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I swear, I Maxim and Nick wouldn't line their cat box with this SHIT.
>>>>Look at this garbage from Ned. Pure shit!
>>>
>>>Mr. OB, I suggest you not to take so seriously some comments about
>>>Ned's work.
>>>The 99% of the audience here are pervs only interested in how much
>>>Hanna's skin Maxim can show, or how much Sarah's skin Nick can show,
>>>regardless of they skills.
>>>
>>>Go on OB, very nice that Gail set, and cuz I'm a perv very perv I dare
>>>to ask if Ned can repeat that theme with Jane or Jillian ...<BG>
>>No, ODDBALL - do take the criticisms very seriously, if you want any customers.
>>You are spamming every newsgroup imaginable, so you and "Ned's" work are going
>>to come under scrutiny. The pics are flat and dull, and frankly, rather
>>amateurish. So you can get sarcastic - or you can work to improve your product.
>>Your choice. I know which one the successful entrepreneur would choose.
>>
>>mf
>
>
>I agree, Ned's stuff is shit. Absolute garbage. And why the hell do
>you think I'm him? I could take better pictures with a disposable
>camera from WalMart.
>
>I post his stuff and spammed a bit for him, but it's not me. I got a
>hold of some of his stuff. I used to post it there. It's his throw
>away stuff.
>
>His stuff is dull, flat, uninteresting. total shit.
Why did I think you are Ned? Just look at the defensive language and sarcastic
responses. You take the criticism personally. That's why.
So, it sounds from your last reply that we won't see Ned's pics all over usenet
posted by ODDBALL then?
mf
|
|