On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>off to the fields.
>>
>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>
>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>
>
>Nah,white background is good.
No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
background problem in Ned's sets.
It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know
what they're doing never uses all white backgrounds.
Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/249', 'Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes yEnc')){kind=link}