On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:14:37 +0200, Louis Holleman <louis@bbst.net>
wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:58:35 GMT, Shiina <Shiina@jp.net> wrote:
>
>>In reply to "Nite Rider" who wrote the following:
>>
>>> Nice.
>>> Interesting.
>>> I prefer photos, not blurry videos.
>>>
>>> But Still, Thanks OP-Shiina
>>>
>>> Nite
>>
>>then you are doin something wrong, cuzz vid is not blurry at all
>
>I think, the camera operator did something wrong.
>First, he/she never heard of tripods, let alone he/she uses one.
>No, fiddling constantly with the zoom button is more interesting.
>A problem btw with the vast majority of would-be camera-operators.
>
>Next the camera-operator seems to be forgetting WHAT he's trying to
>capture.
>Look at 03:50; it must be the wall he wants to show. BTW, during the
>whole movie the wall appears sharper than the girl.
>Focussing is something you learn or never learn. And yes, the wall did
>NOT move!
>
>"No sir, I've got an autofocus camera, so I don't have to worry about
>that!"
>
>Yes, we can see that for 11 minutes: another blurry vid and the only
>interesting thing is that the girl is taking her clothes off.
>Hurray,let's put it on the net!
>
>Let's figure it out: 11 minutes at 30 fps or so, that is some 20,000
>frames in total. How many could you label as "sharp"??? (apart from
>the first ones which only make up the title). Well, I've seen a few
>around 03:50 too.
>
>I'm not gonna say "Thank you very much for that, Shiina" but I guess
>you'll keep calling me a troll :-)
>
>And finally, of course it's possible that I got the whole thing wrong:
>Anny is not the girl's, but the camera's name!
>
>Louis
YEP!
One hand holding the Camera
The other hand pumping the joystick
It could be worse, it could be a selfie stick!
Still Thanks Shiina. It Your posts are Appreaciated even if I have
different likes and dislikes.
Nite
|
|